Talk:European XBRL Taxonomy Architecture
From XBRLWiki
| Revision as of 05:55, 12 October 2012 (edit) Hommes (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 05:56, 12 October 2012 (edit) Hommes (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| === Comment-01 === | === Comment-01 === | ||
| + | RH: Is this terminology stable? I've seen 'report' as term for 'framework' and trying to grasp the essence of a framework I think that it represents a number of forms or tables. In essence its just a semantic name given to a number of forms and or tables, its not defining anything for itself, only by derivation of what it groups. A report (IMO) also represents a single form or table. Which is why I put framework as the proposed name. OTOH the framework seems to represent business rules too and that is not always correct since business rules can be applied on dictionary level, on framework level or on single table and even cell level. | ||
| === Comment-02 === | === Comment-02 === | ||
| RH: The occurences of the owner and his IP rights and supportive languages etc. appear to me to be facts, not meta data expressed in namespace, concepts etc. The owner name is already expressed through the namespace of each schema. | RH: The occurences of the owner and his IP rights and supportive languages etc. appear to me to be facts, not meta data expressed in namespace, concepts etc. The owner name is already expressed through the namespace of each schema. | ||
Revision as of 05:56, 12 October 2012
Comments
Comment-01
RH: Is this terminology stable? I've seen 'report' as term for 'framework' and trying to grasp the essence of a framework I think that it represents a number of forms or tables. In essence its just a semantic name given to a number of forms and or tables, its not defining anything for itself, only by derivation of what it groups. A report (IMO) also represents a single form or table. Which is why I put framework as the proposed name. OTOH the framework seems to represent business rules too and that is not always correct since business rules can be applied on dictionary level, on framework level or on single table and even cell level.
Comment-02
RH: The occurences of the owner and his IP rights and supportive languages etc. appear to me to be facts, not meta data expressed in namespace, concepts etc. The owner name is already expressed through the namespace of each schema.
